Form Follows Function...Or Does It?

Recently I picked up Conversations With Frank Gehry by Barbara Isenberg after reading a review of it in the latest Architectural Record. I’ve never considered myself a fan of Gehry’s work but I can’t say I’m not continually intrigued and inspired by the work he manages to complete. I have visited a few of Gehry’s projects in the U.S. such as the Disney Concert Hall, Experience Music Project, Weisman Art Museum, and the Pritzker Pavilion and I have to say that they are nothing less than impressive to see in person.

Disney Concert Hall

Experience Music Project

Weisman Art Museum

Pritzker Pavilion

For some reason, however, I cringe at listing Gehry as one of my favorite architects. Maybe it’s his Hollywood celebrity status that disqualifies him in my mind. When I think about what Gehry’s design philosophy is, I can’t help but immediately recall that Simpson’s episode where he gets his inspiration for a town project from a crumpled piece of paper!

After reading through some of Gehry’s interviews, I gained a little more insight into this man’s design philosophy and it posed a familiar question. He approaches a project by designing the object(s) and then designing the space within those objects. It is obvious there is a significant focus on the exterior form of Gehry’s projects. I tend to believe in the more modern approach of form follows function whereas Gehry seems to think the opposite. It is like the age-old philosophical question: What came first, the chicken or the egg? I don’t know about that, but I will go on believing that great architectural spaces are the spaces in between and not the objects that contain them. The objects that contain the space can be crucial to the aesthetic and appeal of that space, but without the space you don’t have architecture. There’s no place.

It is commendable that Gehry’s bold, sculptural projects continue to generate a dialogue concerning architecture among architects and non-architects alike. I think there is a place in this world for people like Frank Gehry, but the space is limited. Bold and intriguing Gehry-esque buildings are fantastic, as long as they are few and far between.

A Day In The Life...

A doodle that sums it up pretty well. What can I say? Economic hardship equals a buyer's market and the product is cheap, cheap, cheap! Recent grads - what a bargain!

What Have I Learned So Far?

A coworker recently asked me, “What is the biggest thing I’ve learned so far being an architect out of school?”

This is somewhat of a loaded question. My first thought was, why don’t I have an immediate answer? Second, where do I even begin? On the one hand, I’ve learned so much that I feel like a different person than when I began my internship. On the other hand, I feel like more questions than answers emerge from my brain on a daily basis and maybe I was never fully prepared to enter the profession in the first place.

After a day of deliberation I came up with some possible answers:

1. NOTHING IS GUARANTEED
Whether it’s a project for the office, a job in the profession, or the night off, I’ve come to learn that nothing in this profession is guaranteed!

2. YOU CREATE YOUR OWN OPPORTUNITIES
I’ve learned that as an intern with a lot to learn, it is up to YOU make things happen for yourself. Nobody is going to hand you anything. It is your responsibility to make yourself invaluable to your employer.

3. EVERYONE MAKES MISTAKES
This is the feel-good lesson I’ve learned first hand as an intern! I take great comfort (hopefully not too much comfort) knowing that even the most seasoned professionals make mistakes, just like me. We’re all human after all!

It turns out that the best answers that I could come up with for my coworker were more “life-lessons” but I’m optimistic that understanding these lessons will help me in my career in some way.

If I turn the question back to those of you reading this, what are some of the biggest lessons that you’ve learned so far?